Still haven't seen the admission of a screw up in the cut & paste..

I'm not so arrogant that I won't admit when I'm wrong. I still don't see where I WAS wrong on the copy and paste.

Denise said: My butt has a lot of weight.http://www.atlasquest.com/boards/message.html?gMsgId=381284;gThreadId=53961

Suzi said: No it doesn't muscle weighs more than fat.http://www.atlasquest.com/boards/message.html?gMsgId=381730;gThreadId=53961

I said: Denise I think you've been told you have a fat butt.http://www.atlasquest.com/boards/message.html?gMsgId=381759;gThreadId=53961

My reasoning for my post:

1) muscle weighs more than fat.(more weighty)

2) Denise doesn't have a weighty butt

For statement #2 to be true then Denise's butt must be more fat than muscle.

I stand by my original post.

Suzi, you are the one that needs to admit you're wrong.

Shiloh

My reasoning for my post:

1) muscle weighs more than fat.(more weighty)

2) Denise doesn't have a weighty butt

For statement #2 to be true then Denise's butt must be more fat than muscle.

Ah, very sound logic. Yep, the denial of Denise's "weighty butt" statement could lead to such a conclusion. Spock would be proud.

Knit Wit

Well maybe she told herself that, and certainly she told all of us that, but I certainly didn't tell her that.

I find that I owe you an apology. In light of Shiloh's explanation of the logic of his original post on this matter (http://www.atlasquest.com/boards/message.html?gMsgId=383178), I was wrong in my assertion that you said that Denise had a heavy butt (http://www.atlasquest.com/boards/message.html?gMsgId=381760;gParentId=381759). I am sorry that I misinterpreted what you were saying.

Knit wit

S'ok...Knit Wit...no harm no foul.

Shiloh

Geez.... There must be some other parts of Denise to talk about for days on end..

Nah, that's pretty much it... =)

Sheeb

There must be some other parts of Denise to talk about for days on end.... ;)

Probably, but I refuse to give in when I know I'm right. :)

Shiloh

This subject caught my eye while I was thinking about restricted letterboxes. Maybe somebody else said this, but if a boss who knew about their employee's hobby (or sport) and really wanted to get them fired or written up, there are ways around that. The employer could take note of the days the employee claimed ill, compare that to boxes found within 50 miles on those dates or just get a list of boxes within 50 miles, print clues, find the boxes, and then use a digital camera to photograph the evidence.

Yeah, it's far fetched but if the employer was persistent enough...

So maybe nobody should inform their bosses about their hobby, unless they have evidence of their boss golfing, when they are supposed to be at an important meeting.... but maybe that's not a good idea either.

And SJHB, none of us can be first finders on #1, at least until it is re-planted.. it ha defintely gone missing.

Suzi,

As I stated earlier:

Anyway, I have confirmed with the owner that box #1 was missing. She has since replanted it, in a slightly different location.

I won't be able to make it out to find Box 1 for several weeks, so perhaps you can be first finder on that one.

SJ HB

deniserows inquired:

My butt has a lot of weight. Does that count?

I find that the placement and positioning of appropriate ballast counts incredibly.

Sunny

Denise said: My butt has a lot of weight
Suzi said: No it doesn't."

What part of NO don't you understand?!

Then- my second part- was the *alternative* that if Denise herself really wants to insist that she does have weight in her butt (with which I do not agree), THEN I said.. that any such weight was NOT fat but was MUSCLE.

That was the alternative to No weight in butt- well, if you insist, Denise, don't worry- any weight that is there is just muscle weight not fat.

And, you forgot the third and most obvious option for statement #2 being true- No, she does not have a weighty butt and NEITHER is it heavier weight of muscle NOR lesser weight of fat -it is NEITHER, i.e. she is SKINNY.

So under no skewed construction (I really could not call it 'logic') can you make this accusation.. which seems to be a lot more about making a false accusation than any issue of substance, or importance.

eeeeekkk..I've done that!

Not because I didn't want to work hard for a clue, but I'd hit a road block.