Read Thread: Nasty Log Notes
Re: Nasty Log Notes/HH
Board: Dead Horses, Lemurs, and Kittens!
Reply to: #231978 by recycledpaperbags
May 30, 2008 5:17pm
What a charmingly homophobic remark! Actually, most people who own guns would swear up and down that they are in fact, as far from a pansy as possible. Pansies, on the other hand, are a bit too smart to be toting guns around outside of hunting. :)
Re: Nasty Log Notes/HH
Board: Dead Horses, Lemurs, and Kittens!
Reply to: #232025 by Kirbert
May 30, 2008 5:29pm
Oh, my; don't you have anything better to do than push every button within your reach? If your goal is to get the "pansies" to ally with the raging right-wing bible thumpers in righteous anger, with the support of the Little Old Lady International contingency, flanked by the Pregnant Women will Kick Your Bottom Coalition, perhaps you have succeeded.
Your anti-everything vitriol is a bit over the top; why don't you lay off those who choose not to mount their stamps "properly," those who who choose to worship whatever, and all that homophobic slur stuff?
d.a.
Permits (was Re: Nasty Log Notes)
Board: Dead Horses, Lemurs, and Kittens!
Reply to: #231104 by knit wit
May 31, 2008 2:35am
Actually, it's the park rangers that carry pic-a-nic baskets that give all rangers a bad name.
Re: Nasty Log Notes/HH
Board: Dead Horses, Lemurs, and Kittens!
Reply to: #231315 by Eidolon
May 31, 2008 2:43am
nope. Ignorance of the rules is no excuse.
Like when our city council, instead of repairing the (craggy, eroded, holey) roads, proposed, instead, to make it illegal to drive into potholes. I kid you not.
To put this in perspective, some of the potholes cover an entire lane....
But I'd agree that guidelines is a better term, here. Because it implies "informal rules on how not to be a $#@!@."
Re: Nasty Log Notes/HH
Board: Dead Horses, Lemurs, and Kittens!
Reply to: #231518 by Pungent Bob
May 31, 2008 2:50am
Are they ANSI-approved? FIE Homologated? USOC-sanctioned?
Re: Nasty Log Notes/HH
Board: Dead Horses, Lemurs, and Kittens!
Reply to: #231978 by recycledpaperbags
May 31, 2008 2:56am
Well, there's a reason guns are called 'equalizers.' At least now, you don't have to assume the guy with the most muscles gets what he wants....because there's always that possibility....makes us humble.
Re: Nasty Log Notes/HH
Board: Dead Horses, Lemurs, and Kittens!
Reply to: #232452 by pika rampant sinister
May 31, 2008 6:07am
And yet at no point did I say that...
Just like how in "the real world" local laws/rules are available for public perusal, free of charge, usually at the local library and/or city hall, such a book of "rules" also would have to be.
P.S. Be careful around those potroads (can you even call them potholes?)
Re: Nasty Log Notes/HH
Board: Dead Horses, Lemurs, and Kittens!
Reply to: #232452 by pika rampant sinister
May 31, 2008 7:20am
I suppose it coulda been worse. They could have made potholes illegal, and had the cops out there issuing the potholes tickets! After all, if you outlaw something, that makes it magically disappear, does it not?
Re: Nasty Log Notes/HH
Board: Dead Horses, Lemurs, and Kittens!
Reply to: #232501 by Baqash
May 31, 2008 7:24am
I believe in my town it would have gotten you arrested. I've certainly heard of a great many being arrested for "displaying a firearm" -- but of course there could have been more to it and it was just our lame local media and their usual shoddy coverage.
We are guaranteed the right to keep and bear arms, but it's illegal to "conceal" one and apparently also illegal to "display" one.
Re: Nasty Log Notes/HH
Board: Dead Horses, Lemurs, and Kittens!
Reply to: #232454 by pika rampant sinister
May 31, 2008 11:03am
i understand, also realize now-a-days we actually need them for our protection but i was just saying we didn't ALWAYS need them... there are even ways to get around needing bullets
i was just saying... people who use them to KILL are weak / wimps / cowards... not people that use them as protection because... the protection is heavily needed, people out there are crazy
anywho... i wasn't meaning to offend anyone or anything, i should have explained but thought it wasn't needed, honestly if i owned a gun i would take it with me letterboxing if i were out alone but i feel carrying a knife has the same secure effects [to me it takes the same amount of time to get it out of the bag] even though a bullet can travel far
-*rpb*-
~still sees more negative than positive~
Re: Nasty Log Notes/HH
Board: Dead Horses, Lemurs, and Kittens!
Reply to: #232345 by dorks anonymous
May 31, 2008 11:12am
I learned something today: Being more than 5 decades into this life, I realize that the word "pansy" may mean something different to me than younger people but never does it suggest to me anything homophobic. Being eager no to offend though, I asked our lovely lesbian daughter if the word "pansy" was offensive to her. Her first response was to ask us what context it was put in. When we told her, she said, "Huh? How old are the offended people?" She suggested that 30-somethings might be offended by this word whereas 20-somethings are definitely not. Interesting.
~~Doublesaj~~
Re: Nasty Log Notes/HH
Board: Dead Horses, Lemurs, and Kittens!
Reply to: #232518 by Kirbert
May 31, 2008 11:23am
"Grandmas" post was so shocking I had to check where she lived. . . .Texas!! No surprise--the rules are WAY different there I hear! (SO glad I live in Calif!)
~~Doublesaj~~
Re: Nasty Log Notes/HH
Board: Dead Horses, Lemurs, and Kittens!
Reply to: #232597 by DoubleSaj and Old Blue
May 31, 2008 11:28am
they are way different 8s
and yeah... sometimes i actually do refer to a pansy being a flower [like its supposed to be] not anything homophobic... i still don't even see how pansy can mean anything homosexual
to each their own... atleast i made myself more clear this time 8]
*-rpb-*
and yeah... sometimes i actually do refer to a pansy being a flower [like its supposed to be] not anything homophobic... i still don't even see how pansy can mean anything homosexual
to each their own... atleast i made myself more clear this time 8]
*-rpb-*
Re: Nasty Log Notes/HH
Board: Dead Horses, Lemurs, and Kittens!
Reply to: #232597 by DoubleSaj and Old Blue
May 31, 2008 11:32am
There are two distinctly different Californias: one where the right to bear arms is feverishly defended and the other that would ban them forever. We've lived in both and prefer something in between.
Old Blue
a proud gun-owning father of a terrific lesbian daughter
Re: Nasty Log Notes/HH
Board: Dead Horses, Lemurs, and Kittens!
Reply to: #232575 by Baqash
May 31, 2008 1:15pm
True enough. Does anyone else find it interesting that you have to take a course and pay an annual fee to obtain a permit to do something that was guaranteed your right to do in the Constitution?
You are aware, of course, that the entire concealed carry permit scheme was originally contrived to keep firearms out of the hands of black people. When you and your sheet-wearin' buddies are all fired up for a good lynchin', the guest of honor having a gun can ruin your whole evening.
Later, the state of California took the idea a bit further and didn't issue any concealed carry permits at all, to anyone, for something like 25 years.
Re: Nasty Log Notes/HH
Board: Dead Horses, Lemurs, and Kittens!
Reply to: #232590 by recycledpaperbags
May 31, 2008 1:21pm
Uhhhh, yes, we did -- even before they existed.
Here's a mental exercise worth contemplating. Somebody is out to kill you. He does NOT have a gun -- but he might have a baseball bat, or a machete, or a car, or any of dozens of other readily-available items at his disposal. And he doesn't care if he gets arrested, convicted, and executed after he kills you. What will you do?
Better than nothing, not as good as a gun.
Re: Nasty Log Notes/HH
Board: Dead Horses, Lemurs, and Kittens!
Reply to: #232637 by Baqash
May 31, 2008 1:34pm
OK, I went back and looked over what I wrote, and I'm quite sure I never said or even suggested such a thing. I was merely pointing out where the permit process began. I am fully aware that today a carry permit is considered the ultimate in responsible behavior for gun owners.
Was Nasty Log Notes now a "K" correction
Board: Dead Horses, Lemurs, and Kittens!
Reply to: #232626 by Kirbert
May 31, 2008 3:39pm
Okay Kirbert, I've read a bunch of your stuff lately and just shuddered!
This time you have posted a false statement. California has issued CCW permits, via the local Chief of Police, or Sheriff. While the permits are "State" permits the local authorities issue them.
I originally had a CCW permit issued through Long Beach in 1968 and held it continuesly for many years until I moved. Was it common..no. There were but 14 of us (CCW permit holders) issued out of Long Beach.
There were several issued in Signal Hill, and several issued in Kern Co. Kern Co is currently issuing.
I would imagine that there may have been other cities, or counties that issued California Concealed Carry permits as well, but I do not know for sure.
There was never any 25 year period that California did not issue, they were only very selective to whom they issued.
If you are going to post "your" facts, please be accurate.
Don
Re: Was Nasty Log Notes now a "K" correction
Board: Dead Horses, Lemurs, and Kittens!
Reply to: #232681 by Baqash
May 31, 2008 3:57pm
This apology is for all those letterboxers reading this board and wondering what in heck all of this gun talk has to do with "Traditional Letterboxes".
I probably could have just let it go, not posted what I did, but that isn't me. Hopefully some other moderator will have better sense than I did and just move the dang thread.
Don, who is now ending his part of this non-letterboxing thread.
I probably could have just let it go, not posted what I did, but that isn't me. Hopefully some other moderator will have better sense than I did and just move the dang thread.
Don, who is now ending his part of this non-letterboxing thread.
Re: Was Nasty Log Notes now a "K" correction
Board: Dead Horses, Lemurs, and Kittens!
Reply to: #232685 by Don and Gwen
May 31, 2008 6:37pm
Ah, Don, when the gun-word is invoked ... time to move it to Dead Lemurs. But, folks, please do not be encouraged to debate the best way to use the gun to kill a lemur or kitten.
Re: Nasty Log Notes/HH
Board: Dead Horses, Lemurs, and Kittens!
Reply to: #232644 by Baqash
May 31, 2008 11:25pm
Ah, I see that. I apologize for that, it was unintentional. By "you" I didn't mean you in particular, I meant it in a more general manner.
Re: Was Nasty Log Notes now a "K" correction
Board: Dead Horses, Lemurs, and Kittens!
Reply to: #232734 by speedsquare
May 31, 2008 11:26pm
Can Ryan set that up as automatic? The word "gun" in a message automatically moves the thread to Dead Lemurs?
Re: Was Nasty Log Notes now a "K" correction
Board: Dead Horses, Lemurs, and Kittens!
Reply to: #232836 by Kirbert
May 31, 2008 11:28pm
It might be easier for me to automatically move any post you make to the Dead Lemurs board. ;o)
-- Ryan
Re: Nasty Log Notes/HH
Board: Dead Horses, Lemurs, and Kittens!
Reply to: #232491 by Eidolon
Jun 1, 2008 1:27am
Not always; once, I ran afoul of a new piece of state law, and when I asked about it, the guy said it hadn't, yet, been posted, but that ignorance of the law was no excuse.....I was at a loss to know where to begin my protest....Ever had one of those, "that's so ridiculous, I don't even know what to say," moments?
But I was kidding. About the "laws" of letterboxing.
We need an enforcement arm. kgb; kommitiet grazhdanin boxing. people keep disappearing.....
Re: Nasty Log Notes/HH
Board: Dead Horses, Lemurs, and Kittens!
Reply to: #232501 by Baqash
Jun 1, 2008 2:16am
Man, that sucks....sorry to hear it. But you lived...and that's good.
Re: Nasty Log Notes/HH
Board: Dead Horses, Lemurs, and Kittens!
Reply to: #232516 by Kirbert
Jun 1, 2008 2:26am
Uh....outlaw potholes, and only outlaws will have potholes?
hey, with enough tickets, you might fill the pothole....
Re: Nasty Log Notes/HH
Board: Dead Horses, Lemurs, and Kittens!
Reply to: #232590 by recycledpaperbags
Jun 1, 2008 3:15am
Arrows and crossbow bolts and slingstones...basically, any ranged weapon can help a weak man against a stronger man. The gun doesn't require any strength to use (though the crossbow requires less than the bow, and the slingstone requires the most accuracy, the longest prep, and the least strength [long moment arm]).
the gun, however, requires less paranoia on the part of the user, since it is fast....
As far as not needing them, well, it depends on what you mean. People have died from strong people for thousands of years...a gun might have kept them alive....but if you consider staying alive not a need...
Re: Nasty Log Notes/HH
Board: Dead Horses, Lemurs, and Kittens!
Reply to: #232593 by DoubleSaj and Old Blue
Jun 1, 2008 3:18am
Wanna hear something REALLY weird? I had a lesbian friend (and too bad, too; she was cute and I would'a asked her out) who kept using the word "gay" as a pejorative.....and gave me a mental jar every time she did it.
"Oh, that is so gay."
Me: *wobble* ....uh...what?
Re: Nasty Log Notes/HH
Board: Dead Horses, Lemurs, and Kittens!
Reply to: #232597 by DoubleSaj and Old Blue
Jun 1, 2008 3:19am
*snort*....I'm guessing you don't live in Compton.
Re: Nasty Log Notes
Board: Dead Horses, Lemurs, and Kittens!
Reply to: #231056 by Cyclonic
Apr 25, 2009 1:44pm
BWAK! bwak bwak bwak bwak bwak
I like chickens, and the way they speak.